Cohere's translation model beats DeepL. You can't sell it.
North Small Translate scores 83.60 on WMT26 against DeepL NextGen's 81.37, then ships under CC BY-NC. Read the license before you plan your localization.
Cohere released North-Small-Translate-1.0 on September 10, and it is now the best-scoring open-weight machine translation model we know of. It beats DeepL NextGen. It beats Google Translate by fifteen points. It also ships under a non-commercial license, which means the version you can download is the version you cannot put in front of a paying customer. Both halves of that sentence matter if you sell across a border.
What actually happened
Per Cohere's announcement, North Small Translate is a sparse mixture-of-experts model: 218B total parameters, 25B active, 50 languages, 16k tokens in and 16k out.
The WMT26 All Languages scores Cohere published:
- North Small Translate: 83.60
- North Small Translate, agentic multi-pass: 84.36
- Qwen 3.5 397B: 81.56
- DeepL NextGen: 81.37
- Google Translate: 68.20
The agentic variant re-reads its own output and fixes what it finds — a second pass, not a bigger model. The regional split is more interesting than the headline: Cohere reports roughly 8 to 10 points over DeepL in South Asia and MENA, 4 to 5 in Southeast Asia, and 1 to 3 in East Asia. The gap is smallest exactly where the incumbents have spent the most money.
Two numbers we would hold onto. Throughput: 112 tokens per second against 81 for a comparable model at low concurrency. Long documents: 48.9 against Google Translate's 21.3 — the failure mode where a translator loses the thread halfway down a product page.
The model card is explicit: CC BY-NC 4.0, plus an acceptable-use addendum. Research and non-commercial use only. Commercial access runs through Cohere sales or the RWS Language Weaver platform. Self-hosting needs a B200, or two H100s at W4A4 quantization.
Why an open translation model matters for your business
If you run a storefront in more than one language, translation is already a recurring bill, and it is usually a per-character contract with a vendor who just got beaten on a public benchmark. That is leverage at renewal even if you never download a weight.
What it is not is a free swap. "Open weights" bought you the right to evaluate, not the right to ship. The honest version of this release is: you can now prove your incumbent is beatable, then negotiate. Run your own corpus — your SKUs, your support macros, your returns policy — through the open checkpoint and the agentic variant, measure it against what you pay for today, and take the result into the room.
And price the hardware floor. A B200 to serve your own translation is a real line item, and for most catalogs an API still wins. The model that changes your economics is not always the model you host.
Key takeaways
- North-Small-Translate-1.0 shipped September 10: 218B MoE, 25B active, 50 languages, 16k context
- 83.60 on WMT26 All Languages vs DeepL NextGen 81.37 and Google Translate 68.20; agentic multi-pass reaches 84.36
- Biggest gains are outside Europe - 8 to 10 points over DeepL in South Asia and MENA
- Long-document score of 48.9 vs Google Translate's 21.3 matters more than the headline for catalog pages
- License is CC BY-NC 4.0 - commercial use requires Cohere sales or RWS Language Weaver
- Self-hosting needs a B200 or two H100s; evaluate on your own corpus before you assume it is cheaper
A benchmark win is a negotiating position, not a migration plan. We build localization pipelines that treat the translation engine as a swappable component, so a better model next quarter is a config change instead of a rewrite. See how we structure vendor-agnostic systems, or bring us a localization bill you want to re-price.
Sources: Cohere: North Small Translate, Hugging Face model card.
- #cohere
- #machine-translation
- #open-weights
- #licensing
- #localization
Tommy Rush — Founder, Rush Commerce
Operator turned builder. 15+ years running operations — now shipping the systems businesses run on. More
Get The Rush Report weekly — one email, zero fluff.
Keep reading
Cognition's SWE-2 lands within a point of Fable 5.1
SWE-2 scores 50.0% on FrontierCode 1.1 at 64% lower cost than Fable 5.1, post-trained on an open 2.8T Chinese base model. What that means for your coding agent budget.
Read itVS Code 1.137 puts your coding agent on a schedule
VS Code 1.137 ships Automations in preview: recurring agent tasks that run hourly, daily, or weekly. Here's what that changes about cost and review.
Read it