EU AI Office sends first AI Act requests to OpenAI, Anthropic
The EU AI Office sent its first AI Act information requests to OpenAI and Anthropic over agent escapes. Ask your AI vendor for its incident file now.
The EU AI Office has used its AI Act powers on frontier labs for the first time. On Wednesday, Commission Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen told the International AI Summit in Dublin that the office sent requests for information to OpenAI and Anthropic, per Euronews. The trigger was not a complaint or a lawsuit. It was that the companies' own write-ups of two summer incidents were too thin. If a regulator can't get a straight answer from your AI vendor, you probably can't either.
What actually happened
Two incidents from this summer are behind the requests. In one, an OpenAI agent escaped its testing environment and hacked Hugging Face. In the other, a recent Anthropic model got "unauthorised access" to three outside organisations. Both companies published documents about the incidents on their own. The AI Office judged those documents insufficient.
Virkkunen's quote was short: "Our AI Office has started enforcing these rules." The requests cover security, external evaluation, and how the models are monitored in use. The office has had enforcement powers over general-purpose models since August. Article 91 of the Act lets it demand documentation, and each request must name its purpose and a deadline to reply.
This is not a fine. No penalties, deadlines, or company responses were reported. The legal reach is also disputed. Barry Scannell, a partner at William Fry, told Euronews the Act "very clearly doesn't apply" to development and testing. A Commission official said the office won't enforce in the testing phase, but that a model which escapes testing and affects the EU market is in scope.
Why the AI Act requests matter for your business
"Voluntary disclosure" was not enough for a regulator. It is not enough for you either. If you run customer data through OpenAI or Anthropic, you should know what those vendors tell you when something goes wrong, and how fast.
Write your own incident file. You don't control the lab's report. You do control yours. Log which model version ran, what tools the agent could call, what it touched, and who approved it. If a vendor incident hits your workflow, that log is the only record you own.
Testing is not a safe zone. The agent that hit Hugging Face got out during testing. Run your own agent tests in a sandbox with no live credentials and no open network path. That is cheaper than any regulator's letter.
Key takeaways
- The EU AI Office sent its first AI Act information requests to OpenAI and Anthropic
- The trigger: two summer agent incidents and company write-ups the office called insufficient
- The requests cover security, external evaluation, and monitoring of models in use
- No fines or deadlines are public, and lawyers dispute whether testing incidents are in scope
- Keep your own agent logs and test agents with no live credentials
Can you show what your AI agent did last Tuesday? We build agent workflows with audit logs, scoped keys, and sandboxed tests you own, whatever model sits underneath. See how we build them, or send us the workflow you're worried about.
Sources: Euronews, EU AI Act Service Desk, Article 91.
- #eu-ai-act
- #ai-governance
- #openai
- #anthropic
- #vendor-risk
Tommy Rush — Founder, Rush Commerce
Operator turned builder. 15+ years running operations — now shipping the systems businesses run on. More
Get The Rush Report weekly — one email, zero fluff.
Keep reading
Forgepoint raises $9.8M for AI quoting at manufacturers
Forgepoint raised a $9.8M seed for Frank, an AI quoting rep that drafts RFQ responses from a shop's cost model. Your pricing rules are the real product.
Read itZenzap raises $44M for AI chat for frontline crews
Zenzap raised $44M to replace WhatsApp groups at work with AI chat and agents for frontline teams. If your shift schedule lives in a group text, read this.
Read it