Skip to content
Rush Commerce
Commerce & Retail Tech3 min read

Visa Trust Index: only 23% trust agents to pay

Visa's new agentic commerce research says 23% of US consumers trust GenAI with a payment, but 61% trust Visa to run the same transaction. Trust is the checkout.

Visa published its Trust Index for agentic commerce on September 9, and the headline number is the one every operator building an agent checkout should have on a sticky note: 23% of US consumers say they trust generative AI to handle a payment transaction on their behalf. The same survey found 61% would trust Visa to run that identical transaction. The agent is not the trust object. The rails behind it are.

What actually happened

Visa's research, announced through its investor newsroom, was fielded on the Harris Poll Omnibus platform May 26–28, 2026 with 2,065 US respondents matched to Census general-adult population.

The adoption side is not the problem. 72% of respondents have used an AI assistant. Willingness to hand one a card is where it collapses to 23%, and it climbs back only when a known payment brand is named: 61% for Visa overall, 68% among 18–34s, 71% among frequent AI users.

The control demands in Visa's companion Earning Trust report are sharper than the trust score. Roughly 90% want transparency into how an agent reaches a decision. About half would stop using agents entirely if that control went away. 85% want explicit visibility into what data is collected and the ability to edit or delete it. Asked what worries them, 50% said data security and 43% said the agent buying the wrong thing.

Why agentic commerce trust matters for your business

If you are wiring an agent into checkout, the failure mode is not a bad model. It is a customer who watches the agent do something they did not sanction and never comes back.

Design for the 43%. An agent that resolves a product and then shows the line items, the total, and the substitution it made before charging costs you one extra tap and buys you the entire objection. An agent that charges silently and emails a receipt is fine until the first wrong size, and then it is a chargeback and a review.

Two concrete things. Put the confirmation step in front of the money, not after it — approval on the cart, not a cancel window on the order. And keep a readable decision trail: what the agent searched, what it picked, why it substituted. That log is what your support team uses to fix the one-in-fifty, and it is what "90% want transparency" actually asks for in code.

The 23% is not a ceiling on agentic commerce. It is a ceiling on agentic commerce that hides its work.

Key takeaways

  • 23% of US consumers trust GenAI to handle a payment on their behalf; 61% trust Visa to handle the same agentic transaction
  • Survey: Harris Poll Omnibus, May 26–28 2026, 2,065 US consumers matched to Census general-adult population
  • 72% have used an AI assistant — adoption is not the blocker, payment authority is
  • ~90% want transparency into agent decisions; ~50% would abandon agents if they lost control
  • Top concerns: data security (50%) and the agent buying the wrong thing (43%)
  • Put approval before the charge and keep a readable decision log — that is the trust feature, not the model

Agent checkout fails on confirmation design, not on model quality. We build commerce flows where the approval step, the substitution rule, and the decision log are yours — readable by your support team and portable if you swap agent platforms. See how we build agent-ready checkout, or tell us where your buy flow is today.

Sources: Visa Investor Relations, Visa Earning Trust report.

  • #agentic-commerce
  • #visa
  • #payments
  • #checkout
  • #consumer-trust
TR

Tommy Rush — Founder, Rush Commerce

Operator turned builder. 15+ years running operations — now shipping the systems businesses run on. More

Get The Rush Report weekly — one email, zero fluff.